Read Time: 08 minutes

A Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justices Bopanna and Hima Kohli today agreed to hear on Thursday the plea by MediaOne TV challenging the order of Kerala High Court banning it.

The matter was mentioned by Dushyant Dave, Sr.Adv, he submitted that the company has been functioning for 11 years and that the company has over 300 employees and millions of viewers.

Dave further submitted that they have been shut down due to some ‘secret file’ from home ministry.

While the Court initially agreed to list the matter on Friday, it was re-listed to Thursday on Dave’s request.

MediaOne TV has moved to the Supreme Court against an order of the Kerala High Court order upholding the ban imposed on MediaOne TV as it went off air on January 31 this year, after its license was not renewed by the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (I&B).

The Centre has said that the denial of security clearance to Media One by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is based on inputs received from intelligence agencies.

The application has been filed by Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd, which operates MediaOne through AOR Pallavi Pratap.

A division bench of Chief Justice S Manikumar and Justice Shaji P Chaly of the Kerala High Court on March 2 upheld the ban imposed on MediaOne TV as it went off air on January 31 this year, after its license was not renewed by the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (I&B). 

The Centre has said that the denial of security clearance to Media One by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is based on inputs received from intelligence agencies.

According to Wikipedia, Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd, operates MediaOne under the Kerala chapter of Jamiat-e-Islami-Hind.

The broadcaster had approached a division bench of the High Court after a single judge bench of Justice N. Nagaresh had upheld the central government’s decision.

In its appeal, MediaOne argued that it had been “victimised” for fair and genuine news reporting. 

It had also argued that no fresh security clearance was required under the relevant provisions of the uplinking and downlinking guidelines for renewal of license.

The Union government, on the other hand, had argued that where national security was concerned, reasons for denial of security clearance need not be provided and principles of natural justice — like giving a hearing, did not apply. 

Background 

On January 31, the Central government had banned MediaOne citing “security reasons”. The Editor of MediaOne, Pramod Raman, had responded to the ban by saying that the government had not been forthcoming with any details behind its decision.

Allegedly, the TV channel, was issued a show-cause notice from the I&B Ministry asking the the channel management why its licence should not be cancelled as the Ministry of Home Affairs had already cancelled its security clearance on “national security” grounds.

The showcause notice to MediaOne read, “The MHA has informed that the security clearance has been denied in the past to the proposals of the company and the security clearance may be considered as denied in the present case also.”

In its reply, the channel told the Ministry that it had never acted against national security, following which its license was renewed in 2019. 

In 2020, MediaOne, along with another Malayalam News channel, Asianet, was again suspended for 48 hours over their coverage of communal violence in Delhi in 2020, with the official orders saying they covered the violence in a biased manner highlighting the attack on places of worship and siding with a particular community.

Unlike in 2019 when the Ministry renewed MediaOne’s licence, after the 2020 order it did not do so and issued an order on January 31, 2022, asking the company to stop operations.

Cause Title: Madhayamam Broadcasting vs UOI